Benchmarks · a Freerouting alternative

Koppar vs Freerouting

Freerouting is the open-source autorouter many KiCad users reach for. This is how it compares with Koppar on the same 8 open-hardware boards: the same parts placement, the same design rules and the same 1200 s wall-clock cap, with KiCad 10.0.4 counting what is left unrouted and running DRC.

Fully routed, Koppar
8 of 8
Fully routed, Freerouting
2 of 8
Fully routed with no DRC errors added
Koppar 8 · Freerouting 0
No board back inside the cap
Koppar 0 · Freerouting 4

Board by board

BoardLayersConnectionsKoppar routedDRCTimeFreerouting routedDRCTime
pic-programmer2125100%05.5 s100%54.8 s
rp2040-minimal2150100%05.3 s86%460.6 s
pico-vga4180100%08 s100%811 s
cm5io4431100%0886.7 sno board in 1200 s··
rk3328-som-evb4462100%046.1 s96.54%42610 s
scalenode-cm44446100%079.2 sno board in 1200 s··
stmp157-som-evb4905100%0483.6 sno board in 1200 s··
imx8mp-som-evb4997100%01194.3 sno board in 1200 s··

Routed is KiCad's ratsnest completion on the board each tool returned. DRC is the errors a tool added over the human board's own findings. Measured 2026-10-14/16 on one workstation, 24 cores, one GPU. Boards, rules and harnesses are public inautorouter-bench; the full table, with four more routers, is on thebenchmarks page.

What else differs